Jumat, 21 Desember 2007

BEHAVIOUR BASED SAFETY in connection with Mr. Ridwan Sjaaf


Last month I described the foundation of behavior-based safety, behavior-focused observation and feedback. Additionally, I provided some details on the essential characteristics of the observation card to be used by employees as part of a solid behavior-based safety process. If you will recall, the observations work not only to help employees look-out for one another and increase awareness, but as importantly, to produce the behavioral measures of safety. This month I will introduce the basic behavioral science understanding of “why people do what they do,” the foundation for promoting safety improvements in areas you’ve identified with your observations.

The ABCs of Safety Improvement
A major aspect of behavior-based approaches to safety focus on systematically studying the effects of various interventions on target behaviors by first defining the target behavior in a directly observable and recordable way and then observing and recording occurrences of these behavior in their natural setting. Interventions are implemented to change the behavior in beneficial directions once problem spots are identified. Interventions typically involve modifying or changing the importance of the antecedents and/or consequences of specified target behavior(s). The figure below depicts this arrangement and is often called the “ABC model” of behavior change.
Antecedent (Activator)-----Behavior-----Consequence
---------------------------Person---------------------------
Antecedents or activators, such as safety signs, education/training, rules and policies, come before behavior and are said to direct behavior. That is, they tell a person what to do. Activators are useful when it has been determined that safety problems are a result of workers not “knowing” what to do. Activators can get behavior started, but in most instances, are not sufficient to keep behavior going. Consequences, such as feedback, praise, rewards, and penalties come after behavior and are said to motivate behavior. That is, people generally behave to get pleasant consequences or to avoid unpleasant consequences. Consequence interventions are best when people know what to do, but don’t do it regularly. Finally, the “person” component represents experience. People will behave consistent with what their past experience has told them. That is, if in the past they have received positive consequences for a behavior, they will behave. On the other hand, if in the past that behavior has produced negative consequences (or no consequences) they will not behave. Thus, consequences provide the foundation for durable behavior change. And, we have the power to arrange the work environment to change people’s experiences with consequences. Consider that the most effective activators are reliably paired with the most effective consequences, those that are Positive, Immediate and Certain (PIC). We can create such an arrangement with our behavior-based safety process!

Let's consider an everyday example to understand the power of consequences in determining behavior. When the phone rings (activator), a person will be motivated to answer it (behavior), if on balance his/her experience suggests that someone he/she wants to talk with (positive consequence) is on the other end. He or she would be less inclined to answer if rarely someone they wanted to talk with was on the other end (uncertain consequence) or if he/she had to wait a significant time to speak with that person after the phone rings (delayed consequence) or if only people he/she didn’t want to talk with were calling (negative consequence).

One reason I don’t answer my phone between 6-8 p.m. is that my experience has told me that my friends and clients do not call at that time. Rather, it’s usually someone who wants to sell me something. And, I don’t like talking to sales people. This is a negative consequence of phone answering for me. Thus, you can see, even though the activator has not changed (i.e., my phone rings the same way between 6-8 p.m. as it does during other times), the consequence has (i.e., positive, immediate, and certain during most of the day and negative, immediate, and certain between 6-8 p.m.). Thus, as can be predicted by the consequence, a different behavior occurs. Specifically, I work to avoid the negative consequences typical between 6-8 p.m. (no phone answering) and work to get the positive consequences typical the rest of time (very consistent phone answering).

The same principle can be applied to safety-related behaviors. That is, just as I can predict my phone answering behavior during the majority of the day, we can create a system of positive consequences that will produce occurrences of safety-related behaviors that are just as reliable …once we’ve implemented the behavior-focused foundation of our process. In other words, behavior-based observation and feedback becomes the vehicle with which we can, not only identify areas in need of improvement, but also to apply positive consequences effectively so we can produce real and measurable behavior change. This is truly powerful stuff when done correctly.

Next month I’ll take up the issue of why enforcement is not sufficient to make your facility the best it can be in promoting safety success. I’ll also address common pitfalls to avoid when using positive consequences to motivate employees. Until then, jump start improvements in safety by informally applying the power of positive consequences in your facility by “catching people doing the safe thing” and thanking them for setting the safe example. If you’re sincere about your thanks, and you attach it to a specific behavior, provide it right away, and provide it often, you’ll likely see dramatic improvements in behavior by this time next month.

To close, all of us at CBS would like to wish you and yours a Safe and Happy Holiday season. See you next year.

AERIAL WORK PLATFORMS

Manlifts and scissor lifts, if used correctly, provide quick and safe access to work areas that at one time could only be reached from scaffolding or a crane's manbasket. These lifts are important tools, but there are right and wrong ways to use them safely.

According to Toolboxtopics.com, the most important tip to remember before operating any aerial lift platform, is always read and follow the manufacturer's safety and operation manual. This information must be kept on the rig, and can usually be found in a PVC tube that's tied to the machine's frame or rails.

Other safe operating procedures for manlifts and scissor lifts include:

• Always check for overhead obstructions before driving or elevating the platform.
• Refuel tanks only when the unit is turned off. If battery powered, the batteries should be charged only in a well ventilated area, away from any open flame.
• Prior to each shift a safety inspection should be completed by the operator; this includes both a visual inspection and a function test.
• Elevate the platform only when it is on a firm, level surface.
Scissor lifts are efficient one-direction lifts. They provide a solid surface to work from, but always remember:
• Guardrail, midrails and toeboards must be in place. The toe board can be omitted at the door.
• The platform must be equipped with a mechanical parking brake that will hold the unit securely on any slope it is capable of climbing. The brake should be tested periodically.
• Never use the lift's rails, planks across the rails, or a ladder, to gain additional height.
Unique hazards for manlifts: Manlifts can move in more than a single direction, increasing the risk of mishaps, so it's important to remember the following:
• When ever working out of a manlift, a full body harness must be worn, and properly attached to the basket. A sudden jolt has thrown people from manlifts, before they could react.
• Always maintain a safe distance from debris piles, drop-offs, floor openings, etc.
• Never drive the manlift when it is elevated above the limit the manufacturer considers safe. Each piece of equipment will state what the maximum extension can be while being driven.

VIBRATION HAZARDS

Vibrations caused by power tools, vehicles and heavy equipment expose six million workers to whole-body and hands-transmitted vibration, which can cause vascular, neural and musculoskeletal disorders, according to NIOSH.

A study by Loughborough University in England produced a long list of sources of occupational vibration – from power and impact tools to vehicle seat dynamics and steering wheel vibration (for the complete list, go to: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/hu/groups/noisevib).

The Canadian Center for Occupational Health and Safety says employers can measure vibration with accelerometers and frequency analyzers. They can protect workers from vibration by providing them with appropriate tools and vibration-absorbing materials like gloves. The can train their employees on safe work practices, such as employing a minimum hand grip, avoiding continuous exposure and maintaining sharpened cutting tools. They should encourage employees to consult doctors at the first sign of vibration disease.

EMERGENCY PLANNING FOR SMALL BUSINESS

September is National Preparedness Month, the time to focus on the job of getting prepared for the naturally-occurring or man-made disasters. Small business must focus on emergency planning, because 25 percent of them do not reopen following major disasters, according to the Institute for Business and Home Safety.

In an effort to protect the city’s 65,000 small businesses from earthquakes, fires, electrical outages, severe storms, hazardous material spills, tsunamis and acts of terrorism, The San Francisco Small Business Commission offered these helpful tips, which businesses everywhere can follow:

* Protect critical systems such as computers and telephone equipment from failure or attack by installing surge protectors and antivirus software
* Assemble and store emergency supplies
* Provide for emergency backup power and lighting
* Identify and post evacuation routes and assembly areas
* Develop an emergency communication plan – assess alternate communication systems
* Establish a notification plan and emergency contact list
* Conduct regular exercises with employees to review emergency procedures
* Establish an emergency training plan -- orient employees to your specific recovery plans and provide staff training in first aid and CPR

FROM: Safetytraining on BBS

Certifiacte TL9000 ver 4 for LONGVIN Indonesia


Congratulation for LONGVIN Indonesia awarding TL9000 version 4 year 2007 assited by PT Anadaln Quality Dunia - ICA. Also congratulation to theirs MR; Mr. Tony and Ms. Ira as Documnet Controller. Attached Certificate awarded by BSI UK.

Kamis, 29 November 2007

YORK UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY PROGRAM with permission of author


YORK UNIVERSITY
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY
PROGRAM

Prepared by: Department of Occupational Health and Safety
Reviewed and Edited by: JHSCs for YUSA/APUY, CUPE 3903, CUPE 1356 and 1356-1
Date Developed: September 2002
September 2002 6
d) Where industrial hygiene testing is required, DOHS performs the appropriate testing in
cooperation with the employee, supervisor and appropriate JHSC member(s).
e) DOHS reports all findings and makes recommendations, as needed, to the reporting
supervisor and appropriate JHSC member(s).
f) The reporting supervisor advises the original reporting employee of DOHS’ findings and
makes available to the employee, upon request, a copy of the report, as per the Occupational
Health and Safety Act.

York University Industrial Hygiene Survey Program
Table of Contents
1) Objectives…………………………………………………………………………………3
2) Philosophy……………………………………………………………………………...… 3
3) Program Review………………………………………………………………………….. 3
A) Joint Health and Safety Committees…………………………………………. 3
B) Department of Occupational Health and Safety……………………………… 3
5) Monitoring Schedule………………………………………………………………………4
6) Reporting Procedure………………………………………………………………………5
7) Standards and Guidelines………………………………………………………………… 6

September 2002 3

1) Objectives
To ensure that all potential occupational and environmental health hazards at York University are
controlled and maintained at levels below those established by existing occupational and
environmental health and safety regulations and guidelines.

2) Program Review
The York University Industrial Hygiene Survey Program shall be reviewed once every two years
in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committees.
3) Roles and Responsibilities
A) JOINT HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMITTEES
The Joint Health and Safety Committees (JHSC) are responsible for:
a) Investigating and identifying potential occupational and environmental health hazards and
recommending procedures to eliminate risk.
b) Consulting in the development and review of the York University Industrial Hygiene Survey
Program.
c) Consulting in and having a designated representative present at the beginning of industrial
hygiene testing, as performed by the Occupational Hygienist.
d) Fulfilling any remaining functions or requirements of a JHSC, as defined by Section 9 (18)
of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
B) DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY
The Department of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS) is responsible for:
a) Developing, reviewing and revising the Industrial Hygiene Survey Program at York
University in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committees. The review should
occur once every two years.
b) Providing industrial hygiene monitoring by an Occupational Hygienist in accordance with
the Industrial Hygiene Survey schedule.

September 2002 4
c) Ensuring that the appropriate JHSC worker member has been informed of scheduled (i.e.,
non-emergency) testing so that he or she can be present, as per the Occupational Health and
Safety Act, Section 9(18)(e). Any concerns expressed by this representative should be
documented by DOHS.
d) Ensuring that records of the Industrial Hygiene Survey test results are maintained and that
copies are provided to the appropriate JHSC with the necessary recommendations, if any.

4) Monitoring Schedule
Several potential occupational and environmental health hazards have been identified as part of
workplace hazard analysis at York University. Programs involving worker training, hazard control
and management have been created to address these potential hazards. The following is the
proposed industrial hygiene survey schedule:
Potential
Hazard Application Monitoring Frequency
Asbestos Building repair operations and
renovations
As required by work being performed or as a
result of the unexpected discovery or
disturbance of friable asbestos containing
materials or in accordance with the
requirements set out in the York University
Asbestos Management Program
Indoor Air
Quality
In office areas as well as
industrial settings (e.g. machine
shops, mechanical areas,
garages, etc.)
In accordance with the requirements set out in
the York University Indoor Air Quality
Program
Mould Buildings or areas with water
damage
As required in the case of concerns and in
accordance with the requirements of the York
University Mould Control Program

September 2002 5
Potential
Hazard Application Monitoring Frequency
Noise: Industrial settings (e.g.
power generating facilities,
machine shops, mechanical
rooms, garages, etc.)
Annually, as mandated in the York University
Hearing Conservation Program and upon
request
Ergonomics: Job-specific
throughout campus
As required in the case of ergonomic problems,
in accordance with the Musculoskeletal
Discomfort Assessment Procedure
Indoor lighting: Indoor
workplaces
As required in the case of specific lighting
concerns or indoor air quality concerns
Lasers/Radiation: Science
research laboratories
At least annually, as mandated in the York
University Laser Safety Program and the York
University Radiation Safety Program
Physical
Hazards
(i.e., Noise,
Ergonomics,
Indoor
Lighting,
Radiation,
Lasers,
Thermal
Stress)
Thermal Stress: Job-specific
throughout campus
As required in the case of thermal stress (i.e.,
heat or cold) problems and in accordance with
the requirements set out in the York University
Indoor Air Quality Program
Toxic Gases
(Including
Odours)
Confined spaces and leaks or
spills
As required in the case of leaks or spills and in
accordance with the requirements of the York
University Confined Space Program

5) Reporting Procedure
Upon discovery of an industrial hygiene concern, the procedure below should be followed:
a) Discovery or report of an industrial hygiene concern by the employee.
b) The employee should contact his or her supervisor to begin an investigation, as per York
University’s Hazard Reporting System. Please refer to the following URL for this
procedure: http://www.yorku.ca/dohs/doc/Procedures/hazardreport.pdf
c) If deemed an industrial hygiene problem, the supervisor should contact DOHS to begin an
industrial hygiene investigation.

6) Standards and Guidelines
The results of the Industrial Hygiene Survey, as performed by DOHS, will be compared to existing
occupational and environmental health and safety regulations and guidelines. These may include:
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. Regulation respecting control of exposure to biological or
chemical agents – made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (Reg. 833/90, as
amended by O. Reg. 513/92, O. Reg. 597/94 and O. Reg. 388/00).
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. Regulation respecting asbestos – made under the Occupational
Health and Safety Act (Reg. 837/90, as amended by O. Reg. 509/92, O. Reg. 598/94 and O.
Reg. 386/00).
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. X-Ray Safety – made under the Occupational Health and Safety
Act (Reg. 632/86).
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. Regulations for Industrial Establishments – made under the
Occupational Health and Safety Act (Reg. 851/90, as amended by O. Reg. 516/92, O. Reg.
630/94 and O. Reg. 230/95).
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Threshold Limit
Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices.
• American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Condition Engineers (ASHRAE).
Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (Standard 55-1992) and
Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality (Standard 62-1999).
• Health Canada. Indoor Air Quality in Office Buildings: A Technical Guide (1995) and
Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: A Guide to Recognition and Management
(1995).

New York City Department of Health. Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi
in Indoor Environment (2000).
• Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Nuclear Safety and Control Act and Regulations.
• American National Standards Institute. American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers.
ANSI Z136.1-2000.
• Canadian Standards Association International. CSA-Z412 Guideline on Office Ergonomics.

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000 L1-1 BAGIAN PERTAMA KETENTUAN UMUM

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000
L1-1
BAGIAN PERTAMA
KETENTUAN UMUM
1. Sertifikasi meliputi kegiatan registrasi, klasifikasi dan kualifikasi dengan
ketentuan sebagai berikut :
a. Registrasi adalah pencatatan penyedia barang/jasa yang meliputi
klasifikasi, kualifikasi, dan data administrasi, keuangan, personalia,
peralatan/ perlengkapan, serta pengalaman kerja ;
b. Klasifikasi adalah penentuan/kompetensi usaha penyedia barang/jasa
menurut bidang, sub bidang dan khusus untuk jasa konsultansi termasuk
lingkup layanan ;
c. Kualifikasi adalah penggolongan penyedia barang/jasa (kecil,
menengah, besar) dan penilaian menurut tingkat kemampuan
keuangan (KK), kemampuan paket (KP), dan Kemampuan Dasarnya
(KD) pada masing-masing bidang, sub bidang, dan untuk jasa konsultansi
termasuk lingkup layanan .
2. Penyedia barang/jasa yang mendapat sertifikat, wajib dimuat dalam Daftar
Registrasi Penyedia barang/jasa yang dikelola oleh LPJK /KADIN.
3. Sertifikat penyedia barang/jasa berlaku dan dapat digunakan di seluruh
wilayah Indonesia, dengan ketentuan :
a. Untuk bidang jasa pemborongan konstruksi dan jasa konsultansi
konstruksi, sertifikat dikeluarkan oleh Asosiasi yang telah diakreditasi oleh
Lembaga Pengembangan Jasa Konstruksi (LPJK) atau yang dikeluarkan
oleh LPJK dalam hal asosiasi yang ada belum terakreditasi atau belum
ada asosiasinya
b. Untuk bidang jasa pemborongan non konstruksi dan jasa konsultansi non
konstruksi serta pemasokan barang/jasa lainnya, sertifikat dikeluarkan
oleh Asosiasi yang telah diakreditasi oleh Kamar Dagang dan Industri
(KADIN) atau oleh Panitia Sertifikasi yang dibentuk dan dikoordinasikan
oleh KADIN dalam hal asosiasi yang ada belum terakreditasi atau belum
ada asosiasinya.
4. Prakualifikasi dimaksudkan untuk mengetahui kemampuan penyedia
barang/jasa pada saat akan mengikuti pengadaan barang/jasa.
5. Penyelenggaraan prakualifikasi dilaksanakan oleh panitia pengadaan
barang/jasa untuk setiap pengadaan barang/jasa.

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000
L1-2
6. Panitia pengadaan melakukan prakualifikasi dengan memperhatikan data
yang terdapat pada sertifikat dan informasi lainnya yang dikeluarkan oleh
LPJK/KADIN.
7. Calon peserta penyedia barang/jasa yang diperbolehkan mengikuti proses
pengadaan barang/jasa adalah penyedia barang/jasa yang telah lulus
prakualifikasi untuk setiap paket pengadaan barang/jasa .
8. Konsultan orang perseorangan adalah tenaga ahli yang mempunyai
keahlian langka / khusus untuk melakukan pekerjaan jasa konsultansi
penasehatan dan harus memiliki sertifikat keahlian yang dikeluarkan oleh
Asosiasi Profesi/LPJK.
9. Penyedia barang/jasa yang lulus prakualifikasi, wajib dicantumkan dalam
Daftar Calon Penyedia Barang/Jasa .
10. Penggolongan calon penyedia barang/jasa menurut pangsa pasar
(segmen pasar) mengikuti ketentuan sebagaimana ditetapkan dalam pasal
10 Keputusan Presiden Nomor 18 Tahun 2000 yakni usaha kecil/koperasi
kecil, perusahaan/koperasi menengah, perusahaan/koperasi besar.
11. Penyedia barang/jasa yang akan mengikuti pengadaan barang/jasa pada
propinsi yang berlainan dengan domisili asal penyedia barang/jasa maka
penyedia barang/jasa tersebut wajib memiliki/membuka kantor
perwakilan/cabang.
12. Klasifikasi dan Kualifikasi cabang dari penyedia barang/jasa golongan besar
harus sama dengan induknya .
13. Panitia pengadaan yang melakukan prakualifikasi wajib mengumumkan
hasil prakualifikasi pada papan pengumuman proyek dan
menyampaikannya kepada setiap penyedia barang/jasa yang ikut
prakualifikasi.
14. Pengumuman hasil prakualifikasi tersebut sekurang-kurangnya memuat hal
sebagai berikut :
a. Nama dan perkiraan nilai pekerjaan serta sumber dananya;
b. Nama dan alamat calon penyedia barang/jasa, dan nama pengurus
yang berhak menandatangi kontrak pekerjaan;
c. Nama dan nilai maksimum pengalaman paket pekerjaan yang telah
dilaksanakan dalam sub bidang yang sama/sejenis dalam kurun waktu 5
tahun terakhir ;
d. Lulus atau tidaknya bagi setiap calon penyedia barang/jasa.

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000
L1-3
15. Daftar calon penyedia barang/jasa ditandatangani oleh Panitia
Pengadaan dan disyahkan oleh pengguna barang/jasa .
16. Dalam hal tertentu dan bilamana dianggap perlu, Panitia Pengadaan
dapat melakukan prakualifikasi tersendiri bagi Lembaga Swadaya
Masyarakat ( LSM ) dan penyedia barang/jasa orang-perseorangan.
17. Penyedia barang/jasa yang tidak lulus prakualifikasi dapat menyatakan
keberatannya / mengajukan sanggahan kepada pengguna barang/jasa.
BAGIAN KEDUA
TATA CARA SERTIFIKASI
1. Sertifikasi
a. Klasifikasi dan kualifikasi atas kompetensi serta kemampuan usaha yang
hasilnya berupa Sertifikat.
Sertifikat sekurang-kurangnya memuat informasi yang terdiri atas :
a) Nama penyedia barang/jasa ;
b) Alamat penyedia barang/jasa ;
c) Nama pengurus penyedia barang/jasa ;
d) Klasifikasi usaha yang terdiri atas bidang, sub bidang dan untuk
konsultansi
e) konstruksi termasuk lingkup layanan ;
f) Kualifikasi usaha yang dikatagorikan pada golongan besar,
menengah, atau kecil;
g) Untuk jasa pemborongan dilengkapi dengan informasi
Kemampuan Keuangan(KK), Kemampuan menangani paket
pekerjaan / proyek (KP) dan Kemampuan Dasar (KD) untuk setiap
sub bidang pekerjaan;
h) Untuk jasa konsultansi dan pengadaan barang/jasa lainnya
dilengkapi dengan informasi Kemampuan Dasar (KD) untuk setiap
sub bidang/lingkup pekerjaan ;
i) Daftar lampiran pengalaman pekerjaan 5 (lima) tahun terakhir per
sub bidang dan untuk jasa konsultansi termasuk lingkup layanan.
Daftar pengalaman pekerjaan mencakup nama paket, sub

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000
L1-4
bidang/lingkup layanan, nilai akhir kontrak, nama pemberi
kerja/pengguna jasa, tanggal mulai/selesai pekerjaan.
b. Pedoman Sertifikasi dikeluarkan oleh LPJK / KADIN.
2. Tugas dan Wewenang Asosiasi/LPJK/KADIN dalam Sertifikasi.
Dalam pelaksanaan sertifikasi, Asosiasi / LPJK / KADIN dapat membentuk Tim
Sertifikasi yang mempunyai tugas dan wewenang sebagai berikut :
a. Merencanakan jadual dan menyiapkan dokumen sertifikasi ;
b. Mengumumkan seluas-luasnya tentang akan diadakannya sertifikasi
melalui media cetak, papan pengumuman resmi untuk penerangan
umum , asosiasi terkait dan bila memungkinkan media elektronik ;
c. Mengadministrasi penyedia barang/jasa yang mengikuti sertifikasi ;
d. Melakukan evaluasi dokumen sertifikasi yang telah dilengkapi oleh
penyedia barang/jasa ;
e. Menyusun dan menetapkan Daftar Registrasi Penyedia barang/jasa
untuk disahkan oleh Asosiasi/LPJK/KADIN ;
f. Mengumumkan hasil sertifikasi dan menyiapkan Sertifikat/Surat Tanda
Registrasi Penyedia barang/jasa untuk ditandatangani oleh
Asosiasi/LPJK/KADIN ;
g. Menerima,meneliti, dan melakukan tindak lanjut atas sanggahan
terhadap hasil sertifikasi.
3. Pengumuman Sertifikasi
Pengumuman sertifikasi sekurang-kurangnya memuat :
a. Jadual pelaksanaan sertifikasi ;
b. Tanggal mulai, alamat tempat pengambilan dan pengembalian
dokumen sertifikasi ;
c. Biaya sertifikasi.
4. Tata Cara Sertifikasi
Tatacara Sertifikasi untuk Jasa Pemborongan konstruksi dan Jasa Konsultansi
konstruksi ditetapkan oleh LPJK, sedangkan Tatacara Sertifikasi untuk Jasa
Pemborongan non konstruksi dan Jasa Konsultansi non konstruksi serta

Lampiran I Petunjuk Teknis Keppres 18 Tahun 2000
L1-5
Pemasokan Barang/Jasa lainnya ditetapkan oleh KADIN dan dapat
mengacu pada Tatacara Sertifikasi pada Bagian Keempat.
5. Penetapan Kemampuan Nyata untuk Jasa Pemborongan
Kemampuan Nyata adalah kemampuan penuh / keseluruhan penyedia
jasa saat melakukan sertifikasi meliputi Kemampuan Keuangan (KK),
Kemampuan menangani paket pekerjaan / proyek (KP), dan Kemampuan
Dasar (KD) untuk setiap sub bidang pekerjaan .
Cara perhitungan KK, KP, dan KD dapat menggunakan rumusan berikut ini
atau rumusan lain yang ditetapkan oleh LPJK / KADIN.
a. Perhitungan Modal Kerja (MK)
KB = Kekayaan Bersih
fl = faktor likuiditas
fl = 0,3 untuk penyedia jasa golongan kecil
fl = 0,6 untuk penyedia jasa golongan menengah
fl = 0,8 untuk penyedia jasa golongan besar
b. Penetapan Kemampuan Keuangan (KK)
MK = Modal Kerja (hasil hitungan di atas)
fp = faktor perputaran modal
fp = 5 untuk penyedia jasa golongan kecil ( K2 )
fp = 6 untuk penyedia jasa golongan kecil ( K1 )
fp = 7 untuk penyedia jasa golongan menengah
fp = 8 untuk penyedia jasa golongan besar
c. Penetapan Kemampuan menangani paket pekerjaan (KP)
Dengan memperhatikan kemampuan manajemen proyek yang dapat
MK = fl. KB
KK = fp . MK

TATA CARA DAN PERSYARATAN USAHA JASA PERTAMBANGAN DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN UMUM

DEPARTEMEN PERTAMBANGAN DAN ENERGI
REPUBLIK INDOl'lESIA
DlREKTORAT JENDERAL PERTAMBANGAN UMUM
KEPUTUSAN DlREKTUR JENDERAL PERTAMBANGAN UMUM
Nomor : 275.KJ2019/DDJP/1995
TENTANG
TATA CARA DAN PERSYARATAN USAHA JASA
PERTAMBANGAN DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN UMUM
Menimbang
DlREKTUR JENDERAL PERTAMBANGAN UMUM
Mengingat
952
bahwa dengan telah diterbitkannya Keputusan Menteri
Pertambangan dan Energi No. 536.Kl20 I/M.PEII995
tentang Perubahan Surat Keputusan Menteri
Pertambangan No. 423/KptslMlPertamb/ 1972' tentang
Perusahaan Jasa Pertambangan di luar Minyak dan Gas
Bumi, maka dipandang perlu untuk meniiJjau kembaJi
Surat Keputusan Direktur lenderal Pertambangan No.
09/SK-OO/Pertarnb/1972 tanggal L7 Oesembar 1972
dengan suatu Keputusan Oirektur lenderal Pertarnbangun
Umum.
I. Undang-undang No. II Tahun 1967 (LN Tahun 1907
Nomor 22, TLN No. 2831);
2. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 32 Tahun 1969 (LN Tahun
1969 Nomor 60, TLN No. 2916) sebagaimana tclah
diubah dengan Peratruan Pemerintah No. 79 Tahun
J992 (LN Tahun 1992 No. 130, TLN No. 3510);
3. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 343/M Tahun 1993
tanggal I J September 1993;
4. Surat Keputusan Menteri Pertambangan No. 423/
Kpts/M/PertambIl972 tanggaJ 3 Agustus 1972;
5. Keputusan Menteri Pertambangan dan Energi No.
1748 Tahun 1992 tanggal 31 Oesember 1<,)92;
6. Keputusan Menteri Pertambangan clan Energi No.
536.Kl201/M.PE/1995 tanggal 18 Mei 1995.

MEMUTUSKAN :
Dcngan rneneabut Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal
pertambangan No. 09/SK-DD/Pertamb/1972 tanggal 27
September 1972 ten tang Ketentuan-Ket",ntuan dan
Prosedur serta Persyaratan Untuk Memperoleh Izin Usaha
Perusahaan Yang Bekerja di bidang Jasa-Jasa Usaha
pertambangan di luar Minyak dan Gas BL'mi.
Menetapkan KEPUTUSAN DIREKTUR JENDERAL PERT AM-BANGAN
UMUM TENT ANG TATA CARA DAN
PERSYARATAN USAHA JASA PERTAMBANGAN
DI BIDANG PERTAMBANGAN UMUM.
Pasal I
Usaha jasa di bidang pertmnbangan umum dapat dilakukan oleh :
a. Perusahaan Nasio'1al;
b. Perusahaan Asing yang menanamkan modalnya di Indonesia;
c. Perusahaan Asing yang bergerak di Indonesia seeara insidentil (jangka
waktu tertentu) "
Pasa! 2
(I) Perusahaan Nasional sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasa! I huruf a tersebut
harus berbentuk :
a. Badan Usaha Milik Negara;
h. Baclan Hukurn Swasta;
c. Koperasi.
(2) Perusahaan Asing sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasa] I huruf b dapat
berbentuk :
a. Perusahaan patungan (Joint Venture);
b. langsung, dalam arti seluruh moda!nya dimiliki oleh warga negam
dan/atau baclan hukum asing.
(3) Perusahaan asing sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal I huruf c, adalah
perusahaan asing atau gabungan dari beberapa perus.Jhaan .Ising di luar
negeri.
953

Pasal 3
Perusahaan yang akan menggunakan perusahaan jasa sebagaimana
dimaks'ud da!f\m pasa~-) c harus ter)ebih dahulu mendapat persetujuan dari
Direktur lenderal Pertambangan Umum.
Pasa) 4
Perusahaan yang sudah memperoleh izin usaha dari Direktorat lenderal
Pertambangan Umum dapat melakukan pekerjaan-pekerjaan sebagai mana
dimaksud da)am Keputusan Menteri Pertambangan dan Energi No. 536.K/
20I/M.PEJI995.
Pasa) 5
Perusahaan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 4 dalam melakukan
pekerjaan diwajibkan mengutamakan penggunaan barang-barang buatan dalam
negeri. jasa-jasa dan tenaga kerja Indonesia sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan
yang berlaku.
Pasal 6
(I) Permohonan Izin Usaha lasa di bidang Pertambangan Umum disampaikan
kepada Direktur lenderal Pertambangan Umum e.g. Direktrur Pembinaan
Pengusahaan Pertambangan dengan bentuk sebagail1lana tereantum pacta
Lampiran I Keputusan ini;
(2) Khusus untuk perusahaan yang berdomisili dan melakukan kegiatan pad a
satu wilayah kerja Kantor Wilayah Departemen Pertambangan dan Energi.
permohonan izin usaha disampaikan kepada Kepala Kantor Wilayah
Departemen Pertambangan dan Energi yang bersangkutan dengan tel1lbLJsan
kepada DirekWrat Pembinaan Pengusahaan Pertambangan;
(3) Perusahaan sebagaimana dimaksud dalal1l Pasal I huruf b dan c
permohonan izin usaha jasa ditujukan kepada Direktur lenderal
Pertambangan Umum c.g Direktur Direktorat Pembinaan Pengusahaan
Pertambangan;
(4) Permohonan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam ayat (I). (2) dan (3) (jiajukan
dengan mengisi formulir sebagaimana tereantum pada Lampira.l II (a b c)
Keputusan ini;
(5) Forl1lulir permohonan izin usaha jasa dimaksud dapat dipero)eh pacta
Direktorat lenderal pertambangan Umum c.g Direktorat Pembinaan
Pengusahaan Pertambangan atau Kantor Wilayah Departemen Per-tambangan
dan Energi setempat.
954

Pasa! 7
I) Permohonan yang diajukan oleh Perusahaan Nasional harus dilampiri
dengan persyaratan sebagaimanatercantum dalam Lampiran IIa Keputusan
1m;
~) Permohonan yang diajukan oleh Perusahaan Asing, harus dilampiri dengan
persyaratan sebagaimana tercantum dalam Lampiran II blIIc Keplitusan
In!.
Pasal 8
) Surat permohonan izin usaha jasa yang memenuhi persyaratan akan diteliti
oleh Direktorat lenderal Pertambangan Umum c.q Direktorat Pembinaan
Pengusahaan Pertambangan atall Kantor Wilayah Departemen
Pertambangan dan Energi setempat;
:) Pemberian iz in sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 6 ayat (l) dan (3)
oleh Direktur Direktorat Pembinaan Pengusahaan Pertambangan atas nama
Direktur lenderal Pertambangan Umum, dan pasal 6 ayat (2) oleh Kepala
Kantor Wilayah Departemen Pertambangan dan Energi seternpat atas nam"a
Direktur lenderal Pertarnbangan Urnum.
) Izin usaha jasa di bidang pertambangan umurn berlaku untuk jangka waktu
selarna 3 (tiga) tahun dengan bentuk sebagaimana tercanturn pada Lampiran
III dan dapat diperpanjang atas permohonan perusahaan tersebut dengan
bentuk sebagaimana tercanturn dalam Larnpiran IV serta memenuhi
persyaratan sebagaimana tercantum pada Lampiran Va, Vb, dan Vc masing-rnasing
untuk perusahaan dimaksud dalarn Pasal 2 ayat (I a I b dan I c).
) Perllsahaan Asing sebagaimana dirnaksud dalam Pasal I ayat (3) yang
kontrak kerjanya kurang dari 3 (tiga) tahun, izin usahajasanya diberikan
sesuai dengan jangka waktu kontrak kerjanya.
Pasal 9
Ptrusahaan sebagaimana dimaksud dalarn Pasal I huruf c yang mempunyai
:giatall di bidang usaha jasa lebih dari I (satu) tahun hams rnendirikan
bang di Indonesia.
Pasa! 10
:rusahaan dalarn rnelaksanakan kegiatan usahanya diwajibkan untuk .
Mentaati peraturan-peraturan di bidang Keselarnatan dan Kesehatan Kerja,
955

ISO29001 a QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM for OIL and GAS

TECHNICAL ISO/TS
SPECIFICATION 29001
First edition 2003-09-15
Petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries — Sector-specific quality management systems — Requirements for product and service supply organizations
Industries du pétrole, de la pétrochimie et du gaz naturel — Systèmes de management de la qualité spécifiques au secteur — Exigences pour les organismes de fourniture de produits et services

ISO

Reference number ISO/TS 29001:2003(E)

© ISO 2003

ISO/TS 29001:2003(E)
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
© ISO 2003
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
© ISO 2003 — All rights reserved

ISO/TS 29001:2003(E)
Contents Page
Foreword v
Introduction vi
0.1 General vi
0.2 Process approach vii
0.3 Relationship with ISO 9004 viii
0.4 Compatibility with other management systems ix
0.5 Goal of this Technical Specification ix
1 Scope 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Application 1
1.2.1 Application — Supplemental 2
2 Normative references 2
3 Terms and definitions 2
3.1 Terms and definitions for the petroleum, petrochemical and natural gas industries 2
4 Quality Management System 4
4.1 General requirements 4
4.2 Documentation requirements 5

4.2.1 General 5
4.2.2 Quality manual 5
4.2.3 Control of documents 6
4.2.4 Control of records 6
5 Management responsibility 7
5.1 Management commitment 7
5.2 Customer focus 7
5.3 Quality policy 7
5.3.1 Quality policy — Supplemental 7
5.4 Planning 8
5.4.1 Quality objectives 8
5.4.2 Quality management system planning 8
5.5 Responsibility, authority and communication 8
5.5.1 Responsibility and authority 8
5.5.2 Management representative 8
5.5.3 Internal communication 9
5.6 Management review 9
5.6.1 General 9
5.6.2 Review input 9
5.6.3 Review output 10
6 Resource management 10
6.1 Provision of resources 10
6.2 Human resources 10

6.2.1 General 10
6.2.2 Competence, awareness and training 10

6.3 Infrastructure 11
6.4 Work environment 11
7 Product realization 12
7.1 Planning of product realization 12
7.1.1 Planning of product realization — Supplemental 12
7.2 Customer-related processes 12
) ISO 2003 — All rights reserved

Minggu, 25 November 2007

ISO14001 korelasi dan audit dengan OHSAS18001


Safety Standards for Improving HSE


OHSAS 18001:2007
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT SERIES
Occupational health and safety management systems - Requirements
ICS 03.100.01; 13.100
NO COPYING WITHOUT OHSAS PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW

OHSAS 18001:2007

Publishing and copyright information
The OHSAS Project Group copyright notice displayed in this document indicates when the document was last issued.
© OHSAS Project Group 2007 ISBN 978 0 580 50802 8
Publication history
First published July 2007
Amendments issued since publication
Amd. no. Date Text affected

OHSAS 18001:2007
Contents
Acknowledgement ii Foreword Hi Introduction v
1 Scope 1
2 Reference publications 1
3 Terms and definitions 2
4 OH&S management system requirements 5
Annexes
Annex A (informative) Correspondence between OHSAS 18001:2007, ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 9001:2000 15 Annex B (informative) Correspondence between OHSAS 18001, OHSAS 18002, and the ILO-OSH:2001 Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems 18
Bibliography 22
List of figures
Figure 1 - OH&S management system model for this OHSAS Standard vi
List of tables
Table A.1 - Correspondence between OHSAS 18001:2007, ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 9001:2000 15 Table B.I - Correspondence between the clauses of the OHSAS documents and the clauses of the ILO-OSH Guidelines 20
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i to vui, pages 1 to 22, an inside back cover and a back cover.
© OHSAS Project Group 2007 - All rights reserved • i

Kamis, 22 November 2007

SAFETY dalam lingkungan pekerjaan



Berikut yang diterapkan di Illinois.USA untuk menghindarkan kecelakaan kerja. Silakan didiskusikan apabila ada masukan AQD akan mempublikasikannya. STOP PRESS sudah diterbitkan OHSAS18001 versi 2007 terapkan dan lihat Keselamatan akan menyelamatkan Anda dan Perusahaan Anda. SAFETY STARTS FROM YOUR SELF

LOCK OUT TAG OUT untuk keselamatan kerja



Salah satu proses yang harus dilakukan oleh para pekerja untuk mengeliminasi kecelakaan kerja adalah LOTO atau Lock Out Tag Out. Apabila berminat untuk mengetahui lebih lanjut hubungi AQD

Minggu, 18 November 2007

GLOBAL WARMING SEBAGAI PERDAGANGAN DUNIA ?


Sadety dimulai dari diri kita sendiri




Persyaratan Safety Food ISO22000 meliputi perilaku - sanitasi - higienis - lingkungan



ISO14001 2004 dan Sustainabel development oleh Bpk. Hendra

ISO14001 2004 Sistem Manajemen untuk Lingkungan sebagai image perusahaan - tanggung jawab Organisasi - Kepatuhan pada pemerintah dan Tuhan


EC sebagai persyaratan Eropa



Best Practice Risk Assessment in Consumer Safety
ECOSA European Conference
Edinburgh 21-22 April 2005

Bernardo Delogu
DG Health and Consumer Protection
European Commission

Needs and directions for consistent risk assessment for the objectives of the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD)
To highlight the complexity/variety of EU product safety rules and conformity/risk assessment requirements
To present the risk assessment needs for the application of the GPSD
To identify directions for improving consistency/effectiveness of consumer product risk assessment
The EU Regulatory Framework for non-food Product Safety
Vertical legislation setting essential safety requirements and conformity assessment procedures (toys, LVD, ...)
Legislation requiring pre-marketing approval of certain products (vehicles, medicines, …)
Legislation on specific product categories (e.g. cosmetics)
Legislation on chemicals (classification, labelling, risk assessment, restrictions)
The General Product Safety Directive (supported by voluntary European standards)
Actors of the EU Enforcement/Conformity assessment approach
Product safety standards: standardisation bodies (CEN, CENELEC, ETSI)
Pre-marketing approval: Agencies, Commission, Member States’ bodies
Pre-marketing assessment: producers, notified bodies
Post-marketing surveillance: Enforcement authorities
Assessment in view of implementation measures: Commission, Scientific Committees
Characteristics of different categories of instruments
« New Approach » Directives: essential requirements, supported by standards + conformity assessment modules
Pre-marketing approval requirements/criteria: ex-ante assessment (of types)
Specific regimes (e.g. cosmetics): general requirements and positive/negative lists
Chemicals: requirements/criteria hazard identification/risk assessment + specific restrictions
The GPSD: a general safety requirement, supported by general criteria/specific standards
Risk Assessment for the GPSD (1)
Must be taken into account:
 All types of risks
 Reasonably foreseeable conditions of use
 Entire life-cycle of the product
 Relevant characteristics, including i.a. composition, packaging, instructions…
 Interaction with other products
 Presentation, labelling, warnings
 Categories of (vulnerable) consumers
Risk Assessment for the GPSD (2)
Assessment of the level of risk
A “safe” product:
Must not present any risk, or
Only the minimum risk:
 Compatible with its use
 Considered to be acceptable and consistent with a high level of protection

Serious risk:
Application of particular requirements
Risk Assessment for the GPSD (4)
Experience and problems with the framework:
method has discriminating power: many cases assessed as serious or moderate
majority of respondents agree with outcome (some expected lower level)
sometimes reasonable amount of consensus, in other cases variation is large
Risk Assessment for the GPSD (5)
Objectives for ensuring consistent and
effective risk assessment for the
application of the GPSD:
To ensure the establishment of consistent and high quality standards
To provide producers with « agreed » criteria and tools
To ensure consistent identification of dangerous products and grading of risks by enforcers
To facilitate consensus on controversial cases

Risk Assessment for the GPSD (6.1)
Needs for ensuring consistent and
effective risk assessment for the
application of the GPSD:
 Better and more systematic data on accidents and injuries
 Data and a methodological framework for assessing consumer exposure to chemicals from products
 Further research and assessment of new or complex risks
Risk Assessment for the GPSD (6.2)
Needs for ensuring consistent and effective risk assessment for the application of the GPSD:

 An improved, more comprehensive conceptual framework for risk assessment
 Practical and evolutionary tools for facilitating the application of the risk assessment framework (like check lists, grading criteria for specific risks, etc.)

The way forward (1.1)
The aims: effectiveness and consistency
A practical, gradual and modular approach, based on experience
Need for a cross-sector approach: coordination and consistency across the EU product safety legislation
Need to take into account the international dimension
The way forward (1.2)
To complete an assessment of national practices
Further work on the “framework”, in a cross-sector and multi-risk perspective
To monitor and assess concrete divergences and difficulties, based on notifications
To establish more specific criteria and check- lists
The way forward (1.3)
To seek advice of Scientific Committees on new/complex risks
To develop databases, a tool box and test methods for the assessment of consumer exposure to chemicals from products
To revise and reinforce EU approach for data collection on injuries and accidents

Audit lingkungan


Audit Lingkungan. Limbah yang ada disekitar kita. Ingin lebih jauh tahu untuk audit advance lingkungan ? Kontak AQD - ICA

Rabu, 14 November 2007

PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN (SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT) ISO14001 oleh. Bpk. HENDRA


150
Indicators of Sustainable Development
Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) Theme Indicator Framework

SOCIAL

Theme Sub-theme Indicator
Equity
Poverty
Percent of Population Living below Poverty Line

Gini Index of Income Inequality

Unemployment Rate

Gender Equality
Ratio of Average Female Wage to Male Wage

Health
Nutritional Status
Nutritional Status of Children

Mortality
Mortality Rate Under 5 Years Old

Life Expectancy at Birth

Sanitation
Percent of Population with Adequate Sewage Disposal Facilities

Drinking Water
Population with Access to Safe Drinking Water

Healthcare Delivery
Percent of Population with Access to Primary Health Care Facilities

Immunization Against Infectious Childhood Diseases

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate

Education
Education Level
Children Reaching Grade 5 of Primary Education

Adult Secondary Education Achievement Level

Literacy
Adult Literacy Rate

Housing
Living Conditions
Floor Area per Person

Security
Crime
Number of Recorded Crimes per 100,000 Population

Population
Population Change
Population Growth Rate

Population of Urban Formal and Informal Settlements

ENVIRONMENTAL

Theme Sub-theme Indicator
Atmosphere
Climate Change
Emissions of Greenhouse Gases

Ozone Layer Depletion
Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances

Air Quality
Ambient Concentration of Air Pollutants in Urban Areas

Land
Agriculture
Arable and Permanent Crop Land Area

Use of Fertilizers

Use of Agricultural Pesticides

Forests
Forest Area as a Percent of Land Area

Wood Harvesting Intensity

Desertification
Land Affected by Desertification

Urbanization
Area of Urban Formal and Informal Settlements

Oceans, Seas and Coasts
Coastal Zone
Algae Concentration in Coastal Waters

Percent of Total Population Living in Coastal Areas

Fisheries
Annual Catch by Major Species

Fresh Water
Water Quantity
Annual Withdrawal of Ground and Surface Water as a Percent of Total Available Water

Water Quality
BOD in Water Bodies

Concentration of Faecal Coliform in Freshwater

Biodiversity (15) Ecosystem
Area of Selected Key Ecosystems

Protected Area as a % of Total Area

Species
Abundance of Selected Key Species

ECONOMIC


Theme Sub-theme Indicator
Economic Structure
Economic Performance
GDP per Capita

Investment Share in GDP

Trade
Balance of Trade in Goods and Services

Financial Status
Debt to GNP Ratio

Total ODA Given or Received as a Percent of GNP

Consumption and Production Patterns
Material Consumption
Intensity of Material Use

Energy Use
Annual Energy Consumption per Capita

Share of Consumption of Renewable Energy Resources

Intensity of Energy Use

Waste Generation and Management
Generation of Industrial and Municipal Solid Waste

Generation of Hazardous Waste

Management of Radioactive Waste

Waste Recycling and Reuse

Transportation
Distance Traveled per Capita by Mode of Transport

INSTITUTIONAL

Theme Sub-theme Indicator
Institutional Framework
Strategic Implementation of SD
National Sustainable Development Strategy

International Cooperation
Implementation of Ratified Global Agreements

Institutional Capacity
Information Access
Number of Internet Subscribers per 1000 Inhabitants

Communication Infrastructure
Main Telephone Lines per 1000 Inhabitants

Science and Technology
Expenditure on Research and Development as a Percent of GDP

Disaster Preparedness and Response
Economic and Human Loss Due to Natural Disasters

Selasa, 13 November 2007

PROPOSAL OF TL9000

OHSAS18001 dipersyaratkan oleh pemerintah

Our VIRGINIA Branch visit TL9000 TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Our other Training of OHSAS 18001 TIFICO

situasi training di PT. AQD - ICA

TRAINING PROVIDE BY PT. ANDALAN QUALITY DUNIA

NO. NAMES OF TRAINING DURATION Remarks
a SISTEM KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA
1 Dasar-dasar K3 2 days
2 ISO Intergrasi 9001, 14001, 18001 1 day
3 OHSAS18001: 1999 2 days
4 Awareness K3 2 days
5 Signs rambu-rambu 2 days
6 Lock Out dan Tag Out 1 day
7 Dasar-dasar Pengawasan Keselamatan Kerja 2 days
8 Driving Safety for Company/ Factory 2 days
9 Investigasi Kecelakaan 2 days
10 Lembar Data Keselamatan Bahan (MSDS) 2 day
11 Modul Ahli K3 Statistik Kecelakaan 2 day
12 Manajemen Resiko 2 day
13 Kecelakaan Kerja 1 day
14 Petugas Pembina K3 (P2K3) 2 day
15 Penyakit Akibat Kerja (PAK) 1 day
16 Pelajaran Keselamatan Kerja 2 day
17 Kesehatan Tenaga Kerja 2 day
18 Peraturan UU Tenaga Kerja 1 day
19 UU no. 1Tahun 1970 1 day
b AHLI KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA
20 Ahli Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja 2 days
21 AK3 Listrik dan Instalasi 1 day
22 Investigasi Kecelakaan 2 days
23 AK3 Mekanik 1 day
24 Laporan Kecelakaan 1 day
25 Pemberdayaan Ahli K3 1 day
26 Perngawasan Ahli K3 2 days
27 Pengawasan Ahli K3 Konstruksi 2 days
28 Pengawasan Lingkungan Kerja Ahli K3 2 days
29 Pengawasan Mekanik 2 days
30 Pengawasan AK3 Bejana Tekan 2 days
31 Sistem Pelaporan 2 days
32 SMK3 dan SMK3 Baru 2 days
c O H S Management - Safety
18 O H S Awareness / Risk Management 1 day
19 LOCK OUT TAG OUT 1 day
20 O H S Audit 1 day
21 P 2 K 3 1 day
Biaya Rp.10.000.000,- per day/ (maximum 10 participants)
For 2 days atau lebih (not additional for/ including transportation and accomodations)
Training handout disediakan untuk 10 peserta (CD materi, Certificates, Handout, Simulation)
PT. ANDALAN QUALITY DUNIA TELP, 021-8478692/ 021- 7065 2998 CONTACT:, Ir. Rudy Hp. 0811 844 644
TRAININGS of PT.ANDALAN QUALITY DUNIA - ICA
A: Berdasarkan pesanan/ pembicaraan
A = sesuai
permintaan
A = sesuai
permintaan
A = sesuai
permintaan
SISTEM KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA DAN
TRAINING AHLI K3

KASUS PADA FIRE MANAGEMENT

Kasus Soal No. 1. ( Fire management)

Dalam ruang dapur ukuran 3 m x 4 m tinggi 3,5 m, terdapat sebuah tabung gas LPG. Campuran gas LPG terdiri dari propane 70 % dan butane 30 %. LFL propane 2,1 % dan LFL butane 1,6 %. Bila tabung gas LPG bocor, pada volume minimum berapa m3 gas LPG mulai dapat menimbulkan kebakaran/ ledakan dalam ruang dapur tersebut ?
Diketahui:
C Propane = 70
C Butane = 30
LFL Propane = 2,1%
LFL Butane = 1,6%
UFL Propane = 9.5%
UFL Butane = 8.4%
Luas dapur (V) = (3 X 4 X 3,5) m = 42 m3
Jawab:
Lower Flammable Limit Mixture (LFLm) =

Upper Flammable Limit Mixture (UFLm) =

Jadi volume minimum gas LPG mulai dapat menimbulkan kebakaran/ ledakan dalam ruang dapur adalah =
V minimum gas LPG = LFLm X V (volume dapur)
= 1.92% X 42 m3 = 0.806 m3

DAFTAR UNDANG UNDANG OHSAS JASA KONSTRUKSI

DAFTAR UNDANG-UNDANG dan PERATURAN K3
Pada Konstruksi


1. Peraturan Sistem Manajemen K3 No. 5/ Men/ III/ 1996

2. Undang-undang tentang Keselamatan Kerja UU no. 1 Tahun 1970

3. PerMenaker tentang K3 pada Konstruksi Per 01/ Men/ 1980

4. PerMenaker tentang Penyelenggaraan K3 Per 02/ Men/ 1980

5. PerMenaker tentang Pemasangan Pemeliharaan APAR Per 04/ Men/ 1980

6. PerMenaker tentang Penyakit akibat Kerja Per 01/ Men/ 1981

7. PerMenaker tentang Juru Las Klasifikasi Per 02/ Men/ 1982

8. KeBer Menaker MenPU tentang K3 pada Konstruksi NoKep 174/ Men/ 1986


9. Peraturan Umum Instalasi Listrik Indonesia PUIL 2000

10. Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Per 05/ Men/ III/ 96